Name Critic rates Briefing.com

Briefing.com

Technical
Presentation
Our Rating
6
5
Background:The .com name phenomena returns! Or did it never go completely away. Obviously this name style is a way to be very descriptive and very specific that you will be doing work on the internet. But who isn’t online nowadays anyway – especially in the area of financial analysis?

Our concern with names like these are that (a) they don’t age well, and (b) they will never have the brand power of a Yahoo, Hoovers, or Amazon say, all of whom exist mostly online. As another example, SalesForce.com is already starting to outgrow its name. Since going public and expanding dramatically, they now have many more products than those just for sales forces, so they are struggling to adapt their naming architecture.

With Briefing.com’s imminent IPO, it is no time to change the name. But long term, this will always sound like a young startup. And it will always be confused with people doing political briefings for the president or governor or whoever, especially in times of intense political activity. On the other hand, an IPO is one of the ultimate branding events – if you have a name to brand – and not a .com address.

For more details please visit www.briefing.com.


We have given this name a rating of 5 for presentation, which means we are neutral on the logo. The good news is they have a logo, with a registered trademark and a slogan. But does it have to be that bland? Is there really no excitement about being briefed financially? Hoovers thinks there is if you compare with their logo!

<– Previous

All views expressed here are the personal, subjective opinions of the staff of Brighter Naming.
Your comments and name suggestions are always welcome.

Names analyzed are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Please respect and preserve them.

Naming Articles

Brand insider articles from an experienced marketing team.

Oct 2021: The devil is in the trademark details

Mar 2019:The Power and Value of a Trademark

Jan 2019:4 common branding mistakes

Oct 2018: You named it What?

Linked In

Share this page on LinkedIn:


See his industry naming commentary (where he takes a critical look at names) via the blog on this site