When
Burroughs Corporation merged with Sperry Univac Corporation, to
create a new company in one of the most complicated computer mergers
of all time, a new name was sought so that neither group (or their
customers) would feel they had been subsumed. Instead they came
up with this new name and both lost their stature and identity.
Of course, they made it all red to go out and stand up to "Big
Blue", instead of which today they are a shell of their former
selves.
We
have always been disappointed with this name, starting with the
fact that Sperry's lawyers had made it clear to all management
and marketeers way before this that they wanted nothing else to
do with "Uni" names. Having formerly been called Univac,
they had Uni-this and Uni-that everywhere they turned. Back in
the late 70's they were already saying it was a crowded technology
naming space.
Did
they really need to describe their merger action, which would
soon be forgotten? Did their customers really care about their
internal organization? Couldn't it have been a bit more positive
about what they would do for their users, who were mostly technically
astute and could easily figure out that these respective computer
architectures were wildly different?
Motto:
Get professional help in studying your brand values first - and
focus on what you do for the customer, not what you do for yourself.