|
Background:
Every
time Microsoft changes the name of anything, it garners a lot
of attention, and that certainly has been the case recently with
the announcement of Windows Vista.
A number of inexperienced marketing types weighed in to point
out that there were home appliances, screens, shades, window frames
and other products with the name Vista. So what! Microsoft has
top trademark lawyers. They know what they are doing. They remember
paying off $7 million for the Internet Explorer name.
Notice
in particular, they did not make claims on the name Vista alone.
Only on Windows Vista. And when they
do get around to filing for the registered trademark, we are sure
they will carefully describe it as an operating system only, and
disavow any ownership in the word Windows alone (for which they
have never been able to get the magic R) or the word Vista. Pity
poor Vista Software who never registered their company or database
product name. Sure they have common law rights, but their legal
page only claims rights in the Vista logo. Not name. For now they
are crowing because of the publicity. Downstream it might be interesting
to see what happens. Like what happens if Windows Vista starts
to have embedded database features, for example. No prize for
guessing who has the biggest legal budget!
Regardless,
we are all starting to see names get ever closer to each other.
There are only so many words in the English language that have
a suitable tone and meaning in a given context. And many managers
are reluctant to brand bravely like the consumer giants and introduce
a new coined word. Microsoft is forgiven here because Vista is
after all a third tier branding element, after the Microsoft company
master brand and the Windows family brand. Perhaps
that is also why the Vista part of the logo does not look very
strong.
To
learn more about what will surely be the next standard in consumer
operating systems, please visit www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/.
PS
Call us if you want to discuss naming architectures like the one
we have alluded to in this analysis.
|