|
Background:
We
can't help but cynically ask whether Fusion is really a stand
alone word, or just an abbreviation for confusion? There are 248
entries in the US Federal Trademark register for the name Fusion,
apart from all the unregistered common law usages. Furthermore,
in the restaurant industry, as well as others, fusion is one of
the hottest trends going.
Sure
it is a great word, but do you really want to be marketing your
new car or shaver on the Super Bowl (at millions of dollars a
minute) when both are called Fusion? There are no trademark legal
issues since no one can confuse a shaver with a car. But how unique
is your product and message when it is a common word that someone
else is simultaneously spending millions to brand?
At
least for Ford we recognize the continuation of the new name trend
for vehicles starting with F's - succeeding their earlier E trend.
Also, insiders will know their Fusion car is a fusion of Ford
and Mazda technology. But as for Gillette we are confused. From
a great name like Mach 3 what is the follow-on connection to Fusion?
This is a very disappointing change of direction. Makes us wonder
if those NY City namers been eating too much fusion cuisine lately.
Meanwhile, www.fusion.com is owned by Fusion Marketing out of
the U.K.
|